Choosing a launch monitor is one of the most important decisions when building a golf simulator. Two of the most talked-about options in the overhead category right now are the Foresight Falcon and the Uneekor EYEXO 2. Both deliver excellent accuracy, premium features, and professional-grade performance—but they serve slightly different needs.

Let’s break down how they compare.

Mounting & Setup

• Foresight Falcon:
  Designed as an overhead unit, the Falcon mounts to the ceiling, keeping your hitting area clean and unobstructed. This makes it ideal for multi-sport spaces or commercial setups where floor units can be a tripping hazard.
  
  

• Uneekor EYEXO 2:
  Also ceiling-mounted, the EYEXO 2 covers a wider hitting zone than its predecessor, making it easier for both right- and left-handed players to share the simulator without repositioning.
  
  

✅ Both are overhead units, but the EYEXO 2’s expanded hitting area gives it a slight edge for group play.

Accuracy & Data

• Foresight Falcon:
  Uses advanced photometric technology similar to the Foresight GCHawk. It captures detailed club and ball data, including spin, launch angle, and club path. Foresight has a reputation for unmatched accuracy in both indoors and outdoors.
  
  

• Uneekor EYEXO 2:
  Builds on Uneekor’s camera-based tech with three high-speed cameras. It provides simultaneous ball and club data with highly detailed clubhead visuals (impact location, face angle, etc.). Uneekor’s real-time club data can be especially useful for instruction and game improvement.
  
  

✅ If you want pure ball-flight accuracy, Falcon shines. If you value rich club-face visuals and analytics, EYEXO 2 is the winner.

Software Compatibility

• Foresight Falcon:
  Runs natively with FSX 2020 and FSX Play, Foresight’s in-house software, known for lifelike graphics and extensive course libraries. Third-party compatibility (like GSPro) is more limited without workarounds.
  
  

• Uneekor EYEXO 2:
  Works with Uneekor’s Refine and Refine+ software, but is also fully compatible with popular third-party platforms like GSPro, E6, and TGC 2019. This gives users more flexibility if they want to explore different course packages.
  
  

✅ Foresight offers polish and realism in its own ecosystem, while Uneekor wins for flexibility and software variety.

Space & Room Requirements

• Foresight Falcon:
  Requires a standard overhead mounting height (around 9 feet+). The hitting area is defined but slightly smaller compared to the EYEXO 2.
  
  

• Uneekor EYEXO 2:
  Designed to be more forgiving, the EYEXO 2 has a larger hitting zone, which is helpful for multi-user households or teaching environments.
  
  

Price & Value

• Foresight Falcon:
  Positioned at the premium end of the market, typically starting higher than the EYEXO 2. It’s built for commercial use and golfers who want absolute reliability and accuracy.
  
  

• Uneekor EYEXO 2:
  Still a high-end unit, but generally priced lower than the Falcon. It delivers excellent value considering its wide hitting area, club data, and software versatility.
  
  

Which Should You Choose?

• Choose the Foresight Falcon if:
  
  

• You want tour-level ball data accuracy.
  
  

• You prefer Foresight’s FSX ecosystem and don’t need third-party software.
  
  

• You’re building a professional or commercial setup where reliability and polished presentation matter most.
  
  

• Choose the Uneekor EYEXO 2 if:
  
  

• You want a wider hitting area (great for families, teaching, or group play).
  
  

• You’re interested in detailed club-face analysis for practice and improvement.
  
  

• You want flexibility with third-party software like GSPro.
  
  

• You want premium performance at a slightly more approachable price point.
  
  

Final Thoughts

Both the Foresight Falcon and Uneekor EYEXO 2 are top-tier launch monitors that deliver incredible accuracy and performance. The best choice comes down to how you’ll use your simulator—whether you value polished reliability (Falcon) or versatility and immersive data (EYEXO 2).

Either way, you’ll be investing in a launch monitor that can anchor a professional-grade simulator for years to come.